Did someone forward this to you?Become one of the more than 1000 valued email subscribers. Find Out More 👈

We are thrilled to present the latest Weekend edition of Podcast In Brief! And don't worry, our loyal listeners — you'll still get the occasional real-time update!

Thank you to all our free and paid subscribers for continuing to support us. As an independent media organisation, we can only continue our work with the support of readers like you, unlike others who are supported by well-funded organisations.

Your subscription to Podwires will help to fund our operations as an independent media organisation. Becoming a paid subscriber

First time reading? We would be delighted if you would join us – after all, we have over 1,000 intellectually curious readers already! Sign up here.

We want everyone to know about this, so please spread the word by sharing the email with your friends! (copy URL here)

And, as always, send us feedback at [email protected]

Today's reading time is 5 minutes. - Miko Santos

The Podwires Rundown : Your car just became podcasting’s next battlefield. While we obsess over Spotify wrapped stats and YouTube view counts, there’s a massive listening environment that’s being completely ignored by our industry – and it’s one where people spend four-plus hours every week with nothing but time and a desperate need for good content.

According to a 2025 Gracenote automotive infotainment survey of 4,001 vehicle owners across Germany, Japan, South Korea, and the U.S., conducted between July 28 and August 19, 2025, in-car entertainment is experiencing a critical evolution. The research reveals significant gaps between consumer expectations and current infotainment capabilities, with particular implications for audio content creators and podcasters.

The Key Points:

The Big Picture: For podcasters and producers, this presents both an existential threat and a massive opportunity. The threat? If we don’t solve in-car content discovery, we’ll watch our medium get steamrolled by platforms that do – whether that’s Spotify’s audiobook integration, YouTube’s video dominance, or even traditional radio’s comeback story.

The opportunity? The in-car infotainment market is projected to hit $22.5 billion by 2024 and grow at 11.5% annually through 2030. Automakers are investing heavily in next-gen systems that could finally break down the walled gardens keeping our content siloed.

Here’s what needs to happen: podcasters need to ensure their shows are optimized for voice search and source-agnostic discovery. Producers should consider creating shorter-form content specifically designed for in-car consumption where safety and easy navigation matter most.

The industry needs to advocate for open RSS integration in automotive systems, not just app-specific partnerships that replicate the fragmentation problem. And critically, we need to start treating in-car listening as a first-class distribution channel, not an afterthought. McKinsey found that 38% of U.S. consumers would switch car brands for better in-car tech experiences. That means the opportunity window is open right now – but it won’t stay that way forever.

As a paid subscriber, you will get all of the following for only $8 a month or $80 a year (or the equivalent in your local currency):

The Podwires Rundown: We talk endlessly about the creator economy like it’s some niche corner of the internet, but here’s the reality check: nearly one in five Americans is already in the game. Edison Research just dropped data showing 18% of Americans 13 and older are actively creating and sharing original content online. That’s not passive scrolling – that’s production. And before you assume it’s just Gen Z kids doing TikTok dances, think again. Among 25-44 year-olds, 28% are creating content. That’s Millennials with mortgages and kids, not just teenagers chasing viral fame. The creator economy isn’t coming – it’s already here, and it’s bigger than most of us realized.

According to Edison Research’s national online survey conducted in May 2025 among Americans aged 13 and older, nearly one-fifth of the U.S. population actively creates and shares original digital content. The research reveals significant generational divides in content creation participation, with younger demographics leading adoption while engagement drops sharply among older age groups. The findings come as the influencer industry approaches a projected $500 billion valuation by 2027, according to Forbes.

The Key Points:

The Big Picture: For podcasters and producers, these numbers should trigger alarm bells and opportunity sensors simultaneously. The threat is obvious: with 28% of 25-44 year-olds creating content, you’re facing unprecedented competition from the demographic that traditionally had the most disposable income for premium subscriptions and the most time for media consumption.

But here’s the opportunity nobody’s talking about: those 18% of Americans creating content need audio. They need background music, sound effects, interview clips, narration, and branded audio content for their videos and streams. The podcasting industry has spent years perfecting audio storytelling, sound design, and production workflows.

That expertise is suddenly in massive demand from millions of amateur creators who have no idea how to make their content sound professional. Smart podcasters and producers should be thinking about how to productize their audio skills – whether that’s licensing music libraries, offering audio editing services, creating sound effect packages, or building tools that help creators improve their audio quality. Additionally, the sharp decline in content creation among those 45+ (only 7%) suggests this demographic might actually be more receptive to traditional podcasting as they seek content rather than create it.

This could be podcasting’s sweet spot – serve the older audience that wants professionally produced content while simultaneously supplying tools and resources to younger creators who need audio assets. The creator economy isn’t a threat to podcasting if we’re smart enough to become the infrastructure that powers it.

The Podwires Rundown : Steve Goldstein turned his NYU Business of Podcasting class into a focus group, and the results should worry anyone betting on AI-generated podcasts. Students listened to shows from Inception Point AI – a company cranking out hundreds of machine-made episodes weekly – and rated them on a 1-to-5 scale. The average?

According to an October 13, 2025, classroom experiment conducted by Steven Goldstein, founder and CEO of Amplifi Media and instructor of NYU’s Business of Podcasting course, college students reviewing AI-generated podcasts from Inception Point AI gave the content an average rating of 2.3 out of 5. The study, conducted with Tom Webster, Partner at Sounds Profitable, as guest speaker, converted the classroom into a mini focus group examining student reactions to machine-generated podcast content.

The Key Points:

The Big Picture: For podcasters and producers, Goldstein’s NYU experiment offers critical insights into AI’s actual threat level versus perceived disruption.

First, the emotional DNA of podcasting – what Goldstein calls “voice, vulnerability, and lived experience” – represents a genuine moat against AI replacement. Students didn’t want better AI; they wanted human hosts with credentials, anecdotes, and opinions. This suggests the industry’s anxiety about AI-generated content may be overblown for personality-driven shows, interview formats, and narrative storytelling.

Second, the distinction students made between instructional content (where AI scored higher) and conversational content (where it failed) reveals AI’s actual viable use case: short, factual explainers where warmth isn’t expected. This suggests a potential collaboration model rather than replacement – using AI for research assistance, show notes, or quick informational segments while preserving human hosts for the core content.

Third, the transparency issue matters enormously. Students said the artwork “announced” the content was synthetic, and knowing shows were AI-made influenced reception. This suggests any podcaster experimenting with AI assistance needs clear disclosure policies, not just for ethical reasons but because audiences will reject content they perceive as inauthentic.

Fourth, the prediction that AI will improve over five years but potentially “blur the line between authentic storytelling and synthetic imitation” points to an upcoming credibility crisis. As AI gets better at mimicking human hosts, the premium on verified human creators will likely increase, not decrease. This means podcasters should be investing now in building direct audience relationships, transparent production processes, and authentic personal brands that can’t be replicated.

Fifth, the finding that students would rather read factual content than listen to AI-generated versions exposes a fundamental flaw in the AI podcast business model: it assumes information delivery is podcasting’s primary function. But as the students made clear, information is readily available in text form. Podcasting’s value proposition is the experience of that information delivered through human personality.

Finally, for the podcast industry broadly, this experiment suggests the real competition isn’t AI-generated podcasts – it’s the continued dominance of reading for quick information consumption. If students prefer reading Wikipedia to listening to AI podcasts, the industry’s challenge remains what it’s always been: making audio content compelling enough to justify the time investment. AI doesn’t solve that problem; it potentially makes it worse by flooding the market with mediocre content that trains audiences to associate podcasts with low-quality information delivery.

The Podwires Rundown: At SXSW Sydney this week, two of Australia’s leading podcast scholars dropped a truth bomb that should make every podcaster uncomfortable: the medium we claimed would democratize media might actually be poisoning it. Monica Attard, who spent 30 years at the ABC and won five Walkley Awards, didn’t mince words. “Chat podcasts, where a few people just talk, with no obligation to verify what they say or to adhere to truth and accuracy, can pollute the public sphere,” she said.

And she’s not wrong. While we’ve been celebrating podcasting’s growth and patting ourselves on the back for disrupting traditional media, we’ve conveniently ignored the fact that we’ve also created a misinformation superhighway with zero guardrails. The question isn’t whether podcasting democratized media – it’s whether we can live with what that democracy actually looks like.

According to a panel discussion at SXSW Sydney on October 13, 2025, reported by RadioInfo Asia’s Steve Ahern, podcast industry experts Monica Attard (UTS Sydney Centre for Media Transition) and Siobhan McHugh (podcast studies scholar and producer) raised concerns about accountability, editorial standards, and misinformation in podcasting. The session, moderated by Sarah Gilbert from Impact Studios and UTS Sydney, examined whether podcasting has fulfilled its democratic promise or created new challenges for public discourse.

The Key Points:

The Big Picture: For podcasters and producers, this SXSW Sydney panel exposes uncomfortable realities that demand immediate action. The industry stands at a crossroads between maintaining the open, democratic ideals that made podcasting revolutionary and acknowledging that zero accountability creates genuine harm.

Attard and McHugh aren’t calling for government regulation – they understand that’s nearly impossible given podcasting’s borderless, unlicensed nature. Instead, they’re proposing market-based and cultural solutions that podcasters can implement now: publish your contact information, develop and display a code of ethics, make yourself accountable, and build transparency into your process.

For producers working on narrative or investigative content, McHugh’s example of The Greatest Menace demonstrates the economic challenge clearly – $35,000-$40,000 per episode hour, even at 10% of traditional documentary costs, still requires substantial funding that doesn’t exist in most podcasting business models. This suggests the industry needs to advocate for government or philanthropic support for investigative journalism podcasting, similar to public broadcasting models.

The call for more podcast reviews and critiques represents a critical infrastructure gap. McHugh’s surprise that Australia lacks regular podcast reviews points to an opportunity: professional podcast criticism could serve as a quality filter, helping audiences identify trustworthy shows while creating reputational incentives for podcasters to maintain standards.

The distinction the panel made between empowering marginalized voices (citing examples from Arabic, Myanmar, and Chinese LGBTIQ podcasts) and enabling misinformation campaigns reveals podcasting’s dual nature – the same openness that allows a taboo-breaking show like EIB to discuss women’s bodies in Arabic also permits conspiracy theorists to operate without accountability.

For the podcasting industry, the smartest move isn’t waiting for regulation or hoping the problem solves itself. It’s proactively building credibility infrastructure: professional associations with voluntary codes of conduct, transparent funding disclosures, fact-checking partnerships, and media literacy initiatives that help audiences evaluate podcast quality. Otherwise, we risk discovering that democratizing media without democratizing media literacy just means everyone gets an equal voice in polluting the public sphere.

Podcasting is a powerful way to grow business, and Marketplace Podwires is here to assist you in the easy hiring of top-rated independent podcast producers. Be it branded podcasts that share your products with the entire world or internal series aimed at engaging and energizing your teams, our expert producers can craft stories that meet any brief and bring more personality to your brand's voice. Begin with Marketplace Podwires, and find a dream producer for your project today!

The Podwires Rundown: Your podcast ad is terrible, and I can prove it. Pierre Bouvard, Chief Insights Officer at Cumulus Media | Westwood One, just published research that should terrify every brand buying podcast ads: most campaigns feature too many copy points, say the brand name too late (or not enough), and rely on rational messaging that generates almost zero long-term profit.

According to research published October 13, 2025, by Pierre Bouvard, Chief Insights Officer of the Cumulus Media | Westwood One Audio Active Group, most audio advertising suffers from fundamental creative flaws that undermine sales effectiveness. The analysis, drawing on studies from Nielsen, Effie, System1, Kantar Millward Brown, and other marketing effectiveness firms, identifies specific tactical errors in podcast and radio advertising while providing evidence-based best practices for improving creative performance.

The Key Points:

The Big Picture:

For podcasters and producers, Bouvard’s research exposes critical gaps between industry practice and marketing science that directly impact revenue sustainability.

The findings suggest several immediate actions:

First, educate your advertisers. When brands come to you with 10-point feature lists and demand precision targeting, you’re not doing them a favor by accommodating – you’re helping them waste money. Share this research. Explain that Nielsen data proves creative drives 50% of sales effect while targeting drives far less than advertisers believe.

Second, implement creative standards. Require brand mentions in the first two seconds. Insist on category anchoring (”Kardia, the heart monitoring app” not just “Kardia”). Limit copy points to one main message. These aren’t creative preferences – they’re evidence-based practices that increase advertiser ROI, which means more renewals and longer contracts.

Third, consider developing sonic branding packages. The System1/TikTok research showing sonic assets in the first two seconds boost brand awareness represents a productizable service. Offer advertisers consistent music beds, jingles, or sonic logos across all their reads.

Fourth, embrace entertainment. The System1 data demonstrating humor drives market share growth challenges the serious, feature-heavy tone dominating podcast advertising. Host-read ads already have personality – lean into that rather than forcing hosts to recite benefit lists.

Fifth, push back on the direct-response mindset. The Effie research showing rational, narrowly targeted campaigns generate minimal long-term profit directly contradicts the performance marketing orthodoxy that’s dominated podcast advertising. Yes, attribution is easier with promo codes and specific URLs, but if those campaigns don’t build brand equity, you’re training advertisers to view podcasting as a purely transactional channel with no lasting value.

For the industry’s long-term health, we need advertisers thinking about podcasts the way System1 and Effie recommend: broad reach, emotional creative, long-term brand building. Finally, the finding from Kantar Millward Brown that fewer messages increase recall while more messages decrease it should fundamentally change how podcast ad copy gets written.

Christopher Smith’s observation that “a radio spot is not a hotel – you don’t have to fill all the space” applies directly to 60-second podcast reads that try cramming in every possible benefit. One clear message, repeated with emotion and strong branding, will outperform seven rational points every time. The broader implication: podcasting’s creative standards have lagged behind its distribution growth. We’ve scaled the medium without scaling creative quality, and that gap is costing advertisers – and ultimately podcasters – real money.

Grow your business through podcasting. Marketplace Podwires connects you with skilled producers who can craft compelling stories that align with your brand. Start your podcast journey today! 👈

📖 I appreciate you taking the time to read! See you in the next issue. Got a question or criticism? Just click on Reply. We can talk while we are here.

✍️ Give us a press release and a good-sized landscape photo. Make sure it's newsworthy. Send press releases to [email protected] or click here. Editorially, we may rewrite headlines and descriptions.

📬 Sponsor us and get your brand in front of thousands of Independent Podcast Producers and podcasters. Email us at [email protected] for more information or as personal supporters via Patreon, as your contributions help us enhance the experiences of all our users.

🖊️We are delighted to hear from our subscribers! We would be happy to publish your testimonial if you have found our newsletter to be helpful or if you have a success story to share. 👉 Post a Testimonial: https://testimonial.to/podwires

🚀 We are here to help you succeed! Fill out a 5 minute survey and tell us more about your business and yourself. These questions will help us better understand you and promote your business as part of our mission. It’s a win-win!

🚨 Did someone forward this to you?Become one of the more than 1000 valued email subscribers. Find Out More 👈